🔗 Share this article

After federal agents arrested Columbia University student a student activist in his campus housing, the institute director knew a significant fight was coming.

The director heads a university-connected institute focused on protecting free speech protections. Khalil, a green card holder, had been involved in pro-Palestinian protests on campus. Months earlier, Jaffer's organization had organized a symposium about free speech rights for immigrants.

"We recognized this connection to the case, because we're at Columbia," Jaffer explained. "And we saw this detention as a serious infringement of First Amendment rights."

Major Legal Win Challenging Administration

Last week, Jaffer's team at the Knight First Amendment Institute, together with legal partners Sher Tremonte, achieved a landmark victory when a district court judge in Massachusetts determined that the arrest and planned removal of the student and additional activists was illegal and intentionally designed to suppress protest.

Government officials has said it will appeal the verdict, with White House spokesperson Liz Huston describing the judgment an "unacceptable decision that hampers the protection of the country".

Growing Divide Separating Organization and University

The ruling elevated the visibility of the Knight Institute, propelling it to the frontlines of the battle against Trump over core constitutional principles. However the win also underscored the widening chasm between the institute and the university that hosts it.

The case – characterized by the judge as "perhaps the most important to ever fall within the authority of this district court" – was the initial of several challenging the administration's unusual attack on higher education to go to trial.

Trial Revelations

During the two-week trial, citizen and noncitizen scholars gave evidence about the atmosphere of fear and self-censorship caused by the arrests, while government agents disclosed information about their dependence on reports by rightwing, Israel-supporting groups to select individuals.

A legal expert, general counsel of the academic organization, which brought the case together with local branches and the Middle East Studies Association, described it "the central constitutional case of the current government currently".

'University and Organization Occupy Different Sides'

Although the court victory was hailed by supporters and academics nationwide, Jaffer received no communication from university leadership after the ruling – an indication of the disagreements in the positions taken by the institute and the university.

Prior to the administration began, Columbia had come to symbolize the shrinking space for pro-Palestinian speech on US campuses after it summoned officers to clear its student encampment, disciplined dozens of students for their protests and dramatically restricted demonstrations on campus.

University Settlement

Recently, the university reached a deal with the federal government to pay millions to resolve discrimination allegations and accept major restrictions on its autonomy in a action broadly criticized as "surrender" to the president's pressure strategies.

Columbia's compliant stance was starkly at odds with the Knight Institute's defiant one.

"This is a moment in which the institution and the institute hold opposing views of some of these critical questions," noted Joel Simon at the Knight Institute.

Institute's Mission

This organization was launched in recent years and is housed on the university grounds. It has obtained substantial support from the university as part of an arrangement that had each contributing substantial amounts in program support and long-term financing to launch it.

"Our vision for the institute in the years ahead is that when there is a time when the administration has overstepped boundaries and constitutional protections are at stake and few others is prepared to step forward and to declare, enough is enough, it will be the Knight Institute who will have stepped forward," said the former president, a constitutional expert who helped create the institute.

Public Criticism

Following recent events, the university and the Knight Institute found themselves on opposing sides, with the institute frequently objecting to the university's handling of campus demonstrations both privately and in progressively critical official comments.

In one letter to campus administration, the director criticized the action to suspend two student groups, which the university said had violated policies related to organizing protests.

Escalating Tensions

Later, the director again condemned the university's decision to call police onto campus to remove a peaceful, student protest – resulting in the detention of more than 100 students.

"The university's decisions are disconnected from the values that are essential for the university's life and purpose – such as expression, academic freedom, and equality," he stated in that instance.

Student Perspective

Khalil, in particular, had pleaded with campus officials for support, and in an op-ed written from detention he stated that "the logic employed by the administration to single out me and my peers is a direct extension of the university's suppression playbook regarding Palestine".

Columbia settled with the Trump administration shortly after the trial concluded in court.

Organization's Reaction

Shortly after the agreement was announced, the organization published a scathing rebuke, stating that the agreement sanctions "an astonishing transfer of independence and control to the administration".

"University administration should not have agreed to this," the statement stated.

Wider Impact

The institute doesn't stand alone – organizations such as the civil liberties union, the free speech organization and other rights organizations have opposed the government over free speech issues, as have unions and other institutions.

Nor is it exclusively focusing on campus issues – in other challenges to the Trump administration, the organization has filed cases on behalf of agricultural workers and environmental advocates opposing federal departments over environmental information and challenged the suppression of official reports.

Special Situation

But its protection of campus expression at a university now synonymous with making concessions on it puts it in a uniquely uneasy position.

The director showed understanding for the lack of "good options" for Columbia's leaders while he described their decision to settle as a "serious mistake". But he stressed that although the organization positioned at the opposite end of its host when it comes to dealing with the president, the institution has permitted it to operate without interference.

"Especially right now, I don't take this independence as automatic," he stated. "Should the university attempt to restrict our work, I wouldn't remain at the university any longer."